topleft
topright
 
Chapter 1: Thinking Critically with Psychological Science Print E-mail
Written by Administrator   
Thursday, 01 September 2005
Notetaker: Victor Law
Advanced Placement Psychology
Chapter 1: Thinking Critically with Psychological Science
( http://www.ApPsychology.net )
The Scientific Attitude
•  Scientific approach that is skeptical and open-minded
•  To shift away from illusions to reality, one must use Smart thinking or critical thinking: thinking that does not
blindly accept things, but approaches with skepticism and examines the evidence carefully; Ask how did they
know, on guts and instinct? Are the evidence biased?
•  However, must remember to have humility as too extreme would be stubbornness
The Limits of Intuition and Common Sense
•  Intuition often ends up nowhere
•  Tend to use a lot hindsight bias: tendency to believe that one would have known it after the results are shown;
Seems like common sense; The answer was right there and look how obvious it was
•  Experience it usually when looking back on history; eg. Glen Clark and the fast ferries
•  Humans tend to be overconfident, think we know more than we actually do (probably result of self-serving bias)
•  Hindsight causes us to be overconfident as we believe we would have picked the answer when the results are in
front  of us
The Scientific Method
•  Scientific theory: explanation using set of princi ples to organi se/predict observations
•  No matter how good theory sounds, must put it to test
•  Must imply testable prediction = hypothesis
•  Beware of bias when testing
•  Good experiment can be replicated: the experiment can be repeated and would yield constant results; done with a
different group of people or by a different person ending with constant results
•  Theory useful if:
(1) effectively organises range of observations
(2) implies clear predictions
•  Case study: research method where one person is studied in depth to find universal principles (things that apply
to all)
•  Drawback is that the individual being studied could be atypical, results not universally contained
•  Survey: research method to get the self-reported attitudes/behaviours of people
•  Looks at cases less depth and wording of question affects the response given (framing)Tend to hang around group
similar to us so using them as study is wrong
•  False consensus effect: tendency to overestimate other’s agreement with us; eg. Vegetarians believe larger
amount of pop. is vegetarian than Meat-eaters
•  Population: all the cases in the group being studied
•  To make a good sample, use random sampling: sample that gives each case a good chance of being studied to
ensure results within range
•  Naturalistic observation: observing and recording behaviour in natural settings with any control on situation
•  Like case study & survey, doesn’t explain behaviour
•  When finding a trait that accompanies another, not resulting effect, but correlation: the way 2 factors vary
together and how well one predicts the other
•  Positive correlation: direct relationship where factors increase or decrease together
•  Negative correlation: inverse relationship where one factor goes up while one goes down
•  Does not explain cause, simply show relationship between factors

•  Illusory correlation: perceiving correlation when none exist; Notice random coincidences as not random, rather
as correlated
Experiment
•  To isolate cause & effect, conduct experiments
•  Experimental condition: condition that exposes subjects to treatment
•  Control condition: condition that serves as a comparison to see effects of treatment on experimental condition
subjects
•  Use random assignment: assigning subjects to experimental/control groups randomly to ensure no bias
•  Independent variable: experimental factor being manipulated and studied (by itself, alone, no need to depend on
something) * x-axis
•  Dependent variable: experimental factor that depends on independent variable and changes in response to it * y-
axis
•  Placebo: an inert substance/condition that maybe administered instead of a presumed active agent
•  Double-blind procedure: procedure in which the experimenter and the subject noth don't know which treatment
is given
Bibliography
Myers, David G., Psychology Fifth Edition. Worth Publishers, Inc. New York, NY ©1998

 
Next >

Statistics

OS: Linux p
PHP: 5.2.5
MySQL: 5.0.67-log
Time: 12:44
Caching: Disabled
GZIP: Disabled
Members: 102
News: 680
Web Links: 1
Copyright © 2007 Grommersoft. All rights reserved.
Grommersoft is a non-profit web site dedicated to the proliferation of knowledge. All content is the property of its respective owners. No rights are implied. If you believe something on this web site violates your copyright or intellectual property please contact our legal department for prompt removal. Any ad revenue from this site is used to offset development costs. Usage of this site constitutes your acceptance of these and any other terms stated or implied.
Joomla Templates by JoomlaShack Joomla Templates